Registration for the 2027 Annual EMG Symposium is now open!

The ConEd Solution · Continuing education

Early vs. Delayed Physical Therapy After ACL Reconstruction

A 30-minute report on a 132-patient study comparing rehab started within two weeks of surgery against rehab started at or after four weeks — what improved, what did not, and how far the findings can be pushed.

Developed by The ConEd Solution · Instructor of record: Quinn Millington, PT, DPT, ECS

  • 0.5 contact hours (30 min)
  • Physical Therapy
  • Intermediate
  • Orthopedics
  • Outpatient
  • CES-0004





Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants in outpatient orthopedics, sports medicine, and post-surgical knee rehabilitation, plus clinicians who field questions from patients and surgeons about how soon structured rehab should begin after ACL reconstruction.

Licensed physical therapists and physical therapist assistants working with post-operative knee and sports rehabilitation caseloads.

Intended audience
Physical Therapy
Level
Intermediate
Delivery format
Online, asynchronous, self-paced course: interactive reading with audio or video, and a scored post-test.
Based on

This course reports on a single peer-reviewed cross-sectional study that compared early initiation of physical therapy, defined as a structured program begun within 2 weeks of surgery, with delayed initiation, defined as a program begun at or after 4 weeks, following primary ACL reconstruction. The study included 132 adults, 66 in each group, recruited at a tertiary orthopedic surgery and sports medicine rehabilitation hospital in Khamis Mushait, with data collected from May 2023 through March 2024. Every participant was assessed at a single follow-up visit between 6 and 12 months after surgery.

All figures, findings, and conclusions in this course come from that report. Where the study authors issued recommendations, those recommendations are attributed to them.

Source: cross-sectional study of early versus delayed physical therapy initiation after ACL reconstruction, with functional, proprioceptive, return-to-sport, and graft integrity outcomes. Study dataset posted publicly (DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.14916250).

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.



Course Content

Start Here: How This Course Works
The Evidence Report
5 Topics
The Timing Debate — What Was Studied and in Whom
How Recovery, Proprioception, and Graft Status Were Measured
What This Study Cannot Tell Us
What the Authors Say the Findings Could Mean in Practice
Key Takeaways
Post-test and evaluation
1 Quiz