Registration for the 2027 Annual EMG Symposium is now open!

The ConEd Solution · Continuing education

Imaging in Clinical Education and Diagnostic Reasoning After Post-professional Training: Two Cross-sectional Surveys

Two JOSPT Open surveys report how diagnostic and procedural imaging is handled during terminal clinical education experiences, and how physical therapists with and without fellowship or board certification reasoned through cervical spine cases under uncertainty.

Developed by The ConEd Solution · Instructor of record: Quinn Millington, PT, DPT, ECS

  • 1.0 contact hour (60 min)
  • Physical Therapy
  • Intermediate
  • Leadership
  • Outpatient
  • CES-0186





Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants who supervise or mentor learners, who serve as clinical instructors, who manage clinics that host students, or who are weighing residency, fellowship or board certification. Physical therapist assistants may take this course; the assistant’s contribution to student and colleague learning is described as work carried out under the direction and supervision of the physical therapist.

Physical therapists and physical therapist assistants in outpatient orthopedic, hospital-based and academic settings, including clinical instructors, site coordinators of clinical education, residency and fellowship mentors, and clinic managers planning staff development.

Intended audience
Physical Therapy
Level
Intermediate
Delivery format
Online, asynchronous, self-paced course: interactive reading with audio or video, and a scored post-test.
Based on

Hazle CR Jr, Boissonnault WG, Keeton J, Benson C, Taylor N. Investigating the Integration of Diagnostic and Procedural Imaging Into DPT Clinical Education Experiences. JOSPT Open. 2026;4(3):289-296. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2026.0207

Schumacher MR, Piwowski R, Meyrick TA, Mischel KA, Kisse JM. Exploring the Impact of Post-professional Training on Diagnostic Clinical Reasoning Using the Script Concordance Test for Cervical Spine Disorders: A Cross-sectional Survey. JOSPT Open. 2026;4(2):239-246. doi:10.2519/josptopen.2026.0200

What these two papers are

Both are cross-sectional surveys of clinicians and clinical instructors. Neither measured patient outcomes, and neither tested a treatment. They describe education practice, beliefs and reasoning performance on written cases, and they are presented here on those terms only.

Reviews

There are no reviews yet.

Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.



Course Content

Start Here: How This Course Works
Who Answered the Imaging Survey and Where They Practiced
How the Imaging Survey Was Built and Distributed
What Clinical Instructors Reported About Imaging With Students
Barriers, Blind Spots and the Limits of a Survey of Instructors
Who Took the Script Concordance Test Survey
How the Cervical Spine Vignettes and Scoring Worked
What the Reasoning Scores Showed Across Training Levels
Bringing It Together
4 Topics
Where the Two Surveys Agree About Education and Reasoning
Where They Point in Different Directions
Planning Education, Mentoring and Supervision With What Is Known
What These Surveys Leave Unanswered
Key Takeaways
Post-test and evaluation
1 Quiz